We all know what happened in Paris this last week, but we don't seem to understand what to do about it. I have been watching the News and listening to all the voices. All seem to be stressing how "complex" the whole thing is. I can tell you from my experience and observations that the only way a problem can be solved is when you can see the "simplicity" of the problem. Few things work by complexity. As we know most are very simple once you understand them. It is a rule that if you see it as complex, then you don't understand the problem. The purpose of this blog is to see if I can identify what is "simple" about the Radical Moslem Terrorist. Here goes.
Fear of punishment. This is the main principle of our western logic when it comes to dealing with a problem. It does not matter what the problem is. If it is robbing banks, we use "fear of punishment" to keep it under control. If it is speeding, it is the same. If it is any kind of problem, we deal with it the same way. Terrorists have no "fear of punishment", so our western logic will not work. Get used to it. Those are the facts of life.
Jail and time out punishment. Death is very seldom the punishment in the west. Here is a good example of our flawed logic. Let's say that we have a person who is mentally retarded and robs a bank. If we put this person in jail for 10 years, when that person gets out, they will still be mentally retarded. Is this really any different from terrorists? The prisoners down in Guantanimo are similar to the mental retard above and should not be released. Are you starting to see how simple all this is?
We are now dealing with the Ebola epidemic in Africa as we all know. How are we dealing with the situation? If we know that the desease is in an area, we isolate that area and don't let the Ebola get out. Not all the people in the isolated area have Ebola or are carriers, but we don't let them out until we are 100% sure they are not carriers. We know that the terrorists are inside the Moslem communities just like we know where the Ebola comes from. How is this any different? None! We don't like the idea of not letting people out of the Ebola infected areas, but what is the alternative? Isn't it exactly the same with terrorists and the Moslem community? What we did in Africa is that we sent in Doctors to train the local people in how to deal with the Ebola in their countries. Only when the people in those communities have cleaned up the Ebola do we allow them out. Why don't we use the same kind of logic with terrorists?
How sure do you have to be before we convict a person and sending them to jail or the gas chamber? We have been using a very high standard. We would rather let 100 bad guys go free rather than convict one innocent person. That is how we have been doing it. Here again, it is simple to see that this will not work with terrorists. If we did this, we would never get terrorism under control. What we need to do is to lower the standard for conviction. Should it be 99%, 90% or just 75%. to convict a terrorist? Once convicted we should think of them as mentally retarded and never let them out.
Now, back to Ebola. Once a community knows how we are going to deal with an out break loke Ebola, they will have a great incentive to not let the conditions exist that would cause another epidemic. Can you think of a situation, like in France, where they have "no go" communities where the police allow the Moslems to run their own community not the French government? This has to be the worst possible outcome of the Politically Correct attitude.
Think of how Darwin would deal with the Moslem Terrorists situation? He would use some very simple tools, but he would use them on a very consistent basis. Some may look harsh, but that is life.
