If you have a broken arm and it hurts, what is the cure? We all know that the cure is "time" for your body to heal the broken bone, but what does the doctor do? He gives you pain pills. I think that most of us know that the pain pill has zero to do with healing the broke bone. A further examination shows that this person has had two broken arms before. When asked about his life style, the patient admits that he is a rock climber and falls from time to time. Now that we have some facts, what is the cure for broken arms? Don't risk your life climbing rocks!! Now, let's look at global warming,
We know a few facts about global warming. Thousands of years ago, we did not have a serious problem with global warming, or did we? Something happened that caused the massive glaciers that covered much of Earth to melt. Global warming people ignored that this event ever happened. They do seem to agree that the quality of life of us humans caused global warming. We know that our high quality of life is a direct result of the use of energy rather than muscle power. Can't have one without the other. If we only had a few countries in the world who had a high quality of life and thus used a lot of energy, global warming would not be a problem, but that is not what is happening.
It is clear that the cause of global warming, according to the global warming advocates, is caused by the high use of energy used to attain a high quality of life. If we were all hunter gatherers, we would not have a global warming problem! The problem with that is that few would have any quality of life. Further, we would have to reduce the population of humans here on Earth by at least 90%. The number of humans per square mile would have to be down to about 5 or 6. In the USA, our population density is low, but it is still about 75 per square mile. In many countries around the world their population density is over 500 per square mile. It is impossible to ever get their use of energy down to a level where they have zero impact on global warming.
In England, they have a tradition that the oldest son gets the farm. When I first heard this, I thought that this is not fair! Now, when I look back at it with a wider understanding, I now feel that England had the correct tradition. If they had split up the farm with each generation, sooner or later the land would be divided up into section smaller than a city lot and all would starve or be very poor. What happened to my family was that they were forced to divide up the farm and all got poorer and poorer. The Catholic church has been standing in the way of birth control for over 2,000 years with the result that countries where they dominate becoming the poorest on the Earth. Quality of life is also among the worst on Earth for these same people. Now, you are starting to see the Catholic church climbing on the global warming band wagon, when they have been the main cause for the past 2,000 years. It makes me sick!!
In college I took a class in Wildlife Conservation and learned that wild life habitat's have a "limit" of how many animals they can support. It is so simple to understand when it comes to animals, but it is impossible to get the same point across when it comes to "people". Why is that? We have countries in Central America where there are 500 people or more per square mile. You need to ask, "Who is responsible for this problem?" It is liberal "do gooders" and the Catholic church. I should not lay all the blame on Catholic dogma when Muslim dogma advocates maximum breeding even if they can not afford to feed their children. That is just one more reason why responsible USA citizens need to minimize Muslim immigration. If we don't we will end up as poor as the places where the Muslims came from. Our quality of life will be only a ancient memory!!
We know a few facts about global warming. Thousands of years ago, we did not have a serious problem with global warming, or did we? Something happened that caused the massive glaciers that covered much of Earth to melt. Global warming people ignored that this event ever happened. They do seem to agree that the quality of life of us humans caused global warming. We know that our high quality of life is a direct result of the use of energy rather than muscle power. Can't have one without the other. If we only had a few countries in the world who had a high quality of life and thus used a lot of energy, global warming would not be a problem, but that is not what is happening.
It is clear that the cause of global warming, according to the global warming advocates, is caused by the high use of energy used to attain a high quality of life. If we were all hunter gatherers, we would not have a global warming problem! The problem with that is that few would have any quality of life. Further, we would have to reduce the population of humans here on Earth by at least 90%. The number of humans per square mile would have to be down to about 5 or 6. In the USA, our population density is low, but it is still about 75 per square mile. In many countries around the world their population density is over 500 per square mile. It is impossible to ever get their use of energy down to a level where they have zero impact on global warming.
In England, they have a tradition that the oldest son gets the farm. When I first heard this, I thought that this is not fair! Now, when I look back at it with a wider understanding, I now feel that England had the correct tradition. If they had split up the farm with each generation, sooner or later the land would be divided up into section smaller than a city lot and all would starve or be very poor. What happened to my family was that they were forced to divide up the farm and all got poorer and poorer. The Catholic church has been standing in the way of birth control for over 2,000 years with the result that countries where they dominate becoming the poorest on the Earth. Quality of life is also among the worst on Earth for these same people. Now, you are starting to see the Catholic church climbing on the global warming band wagon, when they have been the main cause for the past 2,000 years. It makes me sick!!
In college I took a class in Wildlife Conservation and learned that wild life habitat's have a "limit" of how many animals they can support. It is so simple to understand when it comes to animals, but it is impossible to get the same point across when it comes to "people". Why is that? We have countries in Central America where there are 500 people or more per square mile. You need to ask, "Who is responsible for this problem?" It is liberal "do gooders" and the Catholic church. I should not lay all the blame on Catholic dogma when Muslim dogma advocates maximum breeding even if they can not afford to feed their children. That is just one more reason why responsible USA citizens need to minimize Muslim immigration. If we don't we will end up as poor as the places where the Muslims came from. Our quality of life will be only a ancient memory!!
