If you don't understand that the human race is going into a different state where smarts and intellect are more important than a strong back or a sharp eye, you can stop reading right now. I got these stats from a government web site for 2012 for the out of wed lock birth rate by different ethnic groups. Here is the data. Overall the rate for the USA is 40.7%. It is one of the worst in the world. For Blacks, the rate is 72.2%. That is down slightly from the peak about 15 years ago. Native Americans is high too at 66.7%, Mexicans or Latin Americans is 53.5%. Whites have gone down hill in the past 50 years and they stand at 25.4%. Asians are the lowest at 17.1%. We know that our children are our future and we are now living in that future. Did you ever wonder why so many companies here in the USA can not find qualified workers for their technical jobs? There are not any jobs for people who make shoes or thread looms like the old days. If you do not have the intellect or technical skills that will be needed in the future, I think that you can kiss you butt good bye in terms of earning enough for any kind of quality of life.
To make matters worse, look at the breeding rates for people in the USA. The very people who have made the worst choices in life, like dropping out of high school are the same ones who are having the most kids. Their kids are the feed stock of our future. It is possible for a kid born into that kind of mess to make it in life, but only if they are born with some intellect and enough drive to get thru high school and learn needed technical skills. Good looks might be enough if you are a prostitute, but not much else. Just how bad is it in terms of who is having all the kids? Remember that it costs the tax payers about $15,000 per year for each kid in school. Do you think these people who are having kids out of wed lock or kids they can not afford in the first place can pay their fair share of taxes to educate their own kids? I don't think so, but you never hear one of these people thanking the family down the street for paying the taxes to educate their kids. Interesting isn't it. Now, who is not fair?
Check these numbers. The high school drop out rate is about 40% nation wide and the median family income is just under $50,000. That means half of the families in the USA earn less than $50,000. If you take this group below $50,000 and calculate the average family income, it turns out to be only about $30,000. How many kids can a family expect to raise on that level of income and do a good job of it? Another stat is those people under $50,000 have twice as many kids as those above. The average income for that upper 50% is about $85,000. Now how does this work out per kid. I think you can do the math, but the numbers work out that those in the upper 50% have 5.67 times as much income per kid as those in the bottom 50%. For a simple minded one mover, they would think that some thing is not fair with all this. Exactly what is not fair? Was the person who finished high school and worked hard and had half as many kids doing some thing bad to the person who did just the opposite? Just who is doing what ever it is that is not fair?
The person who is not fair is the person who does not carry their own share of the load. That is the person who is not fair. To be a part of the team, the person needs to pay their share of the dues. We are all in this together and each player needs to accept the fact that charity is charity and is given by the person who worked hard, like the Little Red Hen, not stolen from the Little Red Hen at the ballot box. People who can not afford or who are not qualified to have or raise kids should not have kids or have far fewer. People should prepare themselves to shoulder their share of the load by finishing high school an learning technical skills. That sound much more like fairness to me. How about you?
PS---Given that the upper 50% of families have 5.67 times the income per kid as the lower 50%, rather that keep taking money away from those in the upper 50% and giving it to those in the lower 50%, why don't those in the lower 50% just have half as many kids? It would seem to me that the kids of those in the lower 50% would be a lot better off and it would not put in risk the whole USA economy. The problem is that it would require Blacks and Latin Americans to be much more responsible and no liberal could handle that. Is there any hope?
